|
The Incarnation:
A Scriptural Basis
The Bible text most used by early
Seventh-day Adventists in the study of the incarnation was Romans
8:3: For what the law could not do, in that it was weak
through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of
sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh.
The phrase in the likeness (en omoiwmati - en
homoiomati) means, to make like; to be like, or to resemble.
We find the identical expression, en homoiomati, used in
Philippians 2:7 where we read that Jesus was made in the
likeness [en homoiomati] of men. Our pioneers
understood this to be a literal description of the incarnation of
our Saviour. They understood this likeness to be more
than a veneer coating, but rather the very nature of Christ.
The New Theology on the
Incarnation
Elder William Johnsson, editor of the Adventist
Review, defends a position exactly opposite of the pioneers
using the same text. Johnsson writes:
We find the identical expression used in
Romans 8:3, en homoiomati, earlier in this letter.
Speaking of the pagans of his day, Paul says they exchanged
the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like
mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles (Rom. 1:23
NIV). Obviously, here the Greek term cannot signify exact
likeness. (Adventist Review, August 12, 1993, p. 4 -
emphasis in the original)
Johnsson also states: The silence of
the New Testament on this specific point of debate is
deafening. (Ibid.) Recently, the same view was given
by Calvin Rock in the pages of the Adventist Review. Rock,
a vice president of the General Conference, writes: My
research leads me to believe that Christ was born with the
purity of Adam before he fell, ... (Ibid., March 31,
1994, p. 15) This conclusion is exactly opposite to the research
of the pioneers of this movement as well as this author.
The facts are: the Scriptures trumpet the
incarnation of Christ with clear notes of reassurance for the
believer that he has a Saviour that can be touched with the
feelings of humanity. The scope of this book prevents an
exhaustive study of this subject. However, we will examine the
doctrine with emphasis being placed on the purpose and necessity
of the incarnation.
The Scriptural View
And without controversy great is the
mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh.
(1 Timothy 3:16) His name would be Immanuel - God
with us. (Isaiah 7:14, Matthew 1:23) When God delivered the
Ten Commandments to Israel He said, I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of
bondage. (Exodus 20:2) The deliverance of Israel from Egypt
was a type of deliverance from sin. Before that emancipation,
Christ had said to Moses, And I am come down to
deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians. (Exodus 3:8)
Christ was not to bring deliverance from a throne in heaven, but
would come down to where man was to give him freedom.
Like the word millennium, the
word incarnationis not used in the Scriptures. It is
derived from two Latin words: in carnis, which translates
in flesh or in the flesh. Did Jesus come
in the flesh and was it sinful flesh that He partook of? While
some today differ with the pioneers understanding of Romans
8:3, the seeker of truth finds in the Scriptures many precious
gems relating to the nature of Christ. In the epistle to the
Hebrews, Paul begins by stating Christs likeness to God.
This is then followed by Paul setting forth His likeness to
men.
But we see Jesus, who was made a little
lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with
glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death
for every man. For it became him, for whom are all things,
and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to
make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings.
For both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all
of one: for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren.
(Hebrews 2:9-11)
The Greek word for became is prepw - prepo.
It is defined as suitable, proper,
it is fit or right. Matthew uses this word in
describing the dialog between Christ and John at His baptism.
Suffer it to be so now: for thus it becometh [prepo]
us to fulfill all righteousness. (Matthew 3:15) Paul also
uses it in Hebrews: For such an high priest was what we
needed for (prepo) us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled,
separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens.
(Hebrews 7:26 margin) What then is Paul trying to tell us in
verse 10? Simply that it is suitable, proper, fit, right, for God
to make Christ perfect through sufferings. (Hebrews
2:10) Paul continues:
Forasmuch then as the children are
partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part
of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the
power of death, that is, the devil; And deliver them who through
fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage. For
verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on
him the seed of Abraham. (Hebrews 2:14-16)
Christ partook of the seed of Abraham.
Abraham was not immaculate with sinless flesh. While some claim
the translation of verse 16 is not the best, those who decry the
King James Version do not mention that Paul, in Romans 1:3,
says that ... Jesus Christ our Lord, ... was made of the
seed of David [not immaculate or sinless] according to the
flesh. Yet Paul goes further so as to leave the reader with
no doubt that he has a Saviour that comes close to us in our
humanity.
Wherefore in all things it behooved him to
be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and
faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make
reconciliation for the sins of the people. For in that he himself
hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succor them that are
tempted. (Hebrews 2:17, 18)
The word translated behooved
in the Greek is ofeilo - opheilo which means to be
bound to, under obligation,
indebted, owe. Commenting on this, Elder
M. L. Andreasen wrote:
If Christ is to be a merciful and faithful
high priest, Paul says it behooves Him in all things
to be like His brethren. This is obligatory. It is a duty He owes
and must not avoid. He cannot make reconciliation for men unless
He takes His place with them and in all things becomes like them.
It is not a question of choice. He should, He must,
He ought to, He is under obligation to, He owes it.
Unless He has to struggle with the same temptations men do, He
cannot sympathize with them. One who has never been hungry, who
has never been weak and sick, who has never struggled with
temptations, is unable fully to sympathize with those who are
thus afflicted. (Letters to the Churches, Series A, #1, p.
6 - emphasis in original)
One may ask, Is not God omniscient? Does
God have to send His Son to our level to find out what we
experience? Why would Christ have to take upon His sinless
nature our sinful nature, that He might know how to succor those
that are tempted? (Medical Ministry, p. 181) First,
the Bible states that Christ emptied Himself at the
incarnation. (See Philippians 2:7 Greek) To die for the sins of
man, Christ must empty Himself and give up His immortality.
But he humbled himself, and took mortality upon him.
(Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, July 5, 1887) Also, He
emptied Himself of His omniscience because the
Scripture states that ...Jesus increased in wisdom...
(Luke 2:52) This could not have been if in His humanity He was
omniscient.
This truth is vital. Unless we struggle
with the same temptations, problems, or trials of those we seek
to help, we are of little use in understanding their trials.
Also, the one in need must know that the sympathizer can
relate by experience to his or her situation! How difficult
it is to help those that look at you with a tear filled face
saying, You dont understand, youve never been
in my situation! The sinner who understands that Jesus has
taken upon Himself our sinful nature can gain courage by the fact
that his Saviour does know by experience the trial he is
under and can relate by experience to our need. Therefore,
Jesus can provide the help we must have when we are tempted
because He condemned sin in the flesh. (Romans 8:3)
The Scriptures further state that Jesus was touched with
the feeling of our infirmities, and was compassed
with infirmity. (Hebrews 4:15; 5:2) The Lord GOD hath opened mine
ear, and I was not rebellious, neither turned away back. I gave
my back to the smiters, and my cheeks to them that plucked off
the hair: I hid not my face from shame and spitting.
(Isaiah 50:5, 6) He Himself took our infirmities, and bare
our sicknesses. (Matthew 8:17) God did not exempt Jesus,
nor did Jesus ask to be exempted. Christs experiences were all
necessary if He was to help His brethren. Thus the Scriptures
state: Wherefore in all things it behooved Him to be
made like unto His brethren... (Hebrews 2:17) Christ, the
Son of the eternal God, became Jesus, the Son of man, that we
might become the sons of God. (1 John 3:1) Christ
became man so that He might redeem man. Jesus was made
what man is:
- Man
... is flesh.... (Genesis 6:3) The Bible says
the Word was made flesh. (John 1:14)
- Man
is under the law: (Romans 3:19)
God sent forth His Son, made of a woman, made
under the law. (Galatians 4:4)
- Man
is under the curse: (Galatians 3:10)
Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being
made a curse for us. (Galatians 3:13)
- Man
is sold under sin. (Romans 7:14) ...
and the LORD hath laid on him
the iniquity of us all. (Isaiah 53:6)
- Man
is a body of sin. (Romans 6:6) Christ has
been made .... sin for us.
(2 Corinthians 5:21)
We see that in all things it
behooved Him to be made like unto His brethren.
(Hebrews 2:17) A. T. Jones noted:
Yet it must never be forgotten, it must be
borne in mind and heart constantly and forever, that in none of
this as to man, the flesh, sin, and the curse was Christ ever of
Himself or of His own original nature or fault. All
this He was made. He took upon
Him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of
men. [Philippians 2:7]
And in all this Christ was made
what, before, He was not in order that the man
might be made now and forever what he is not.
(The Consecrated Way to Christian Perfection, p. 47 -
emphasis in the original)
Three of the gospel writers have
references to the incarnation early in their accounts. Matthew
and Luke both give genealogies with Luke adding great detail
concerning the conception of Jesus. Luke, a physician, records
the words of Gabriel to Mary: And the angel answered and
said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power
of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy
thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of
God. (Luke 1:35) Further, John writes: In the
beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
was God. The same was in the beginning with God. ... And the Word
was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the
glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and
truth. (John 1:1, 2, 14) The One who was with the Father
from the beginning, emptied Himself and became flesh,
flesh such as Mary had. Yet Jesus was not degraded by this
assumption of flesh, for as Luke records, He was that holy
thing.
But when the fullness of the time
was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman.
(Galatians 4:4) Christ must be born of a woman, for being made of
a man would not bring Him close enough to mankind to be the
complete Saviour. Christ must come all the way down to us or He
fails to reach us. In Jacobs vision of the ladder, it
reached all the way from heaven to earth. It did not stop one or
two rungs short. That ladder represented Christ. (See Genesis
32:10-16) For Christ to be able to reach all the way to the
bottom He must be made of a woman. ...Adam was
not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the
transgression. (1 Timothy 2:4) Had Christ been only of a
man, He would have fallen short for the woman had sinned first;
thus sin was already in the world before Adam sinned.
Mary could share no other nature with the
divine embryo than that which she possessed, a fallen nature.
Most Protestants would say they do not believe in the Catholic
dogma of the Immaculate Conception. Yet, few know what the
teaching is about. Most people think it has to do with the
conception of Jesus. Rather, it has to do with the conception of
Mary. The dogma teaches :
By the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ
of the blessed apostles Peter and Paul, and by our own authority,
we declare, pronounce, and define that the doctrine which holds
that the most blessed Virgin Mary, in the first instant of her
conception, by a special grace and privilege of Almighty God, in
view of the merits of Jesus Christ, the Saviour of mankind, was
preserved free from all stain of original sin, has been revealed
by God, and therefore is to be firmly and steadfastly believed by
all the faithful. (Catholic Belief, p. 214)
Thus this teaching states that Mary was
born without sin and preserved so as to be able to be the mother
of Christ without transmitting to Him a sinful, fallen nature.
While most Protestants today reject this version of an immaculate
conception, at the same time they believe another version of an
immaculate conception. Most today believe that the conception of
Jesus was in such a manner that Mary was nothing more than a
surrogate mother. She passed on nothing to Christ. If this is so,
then Jesus falls far short of being the Saviour I need to help
me.
Bible Readings for the Home Circle
The earlier editions of the book Bible
Readings for the Home Circle, a standard reference work among
Seventh-day Adventists, reflected the views of the Adventist
pioneers and correctly commented on the Bible teaching of the
incarnation:
The idea that Christ was born of an
immaculate or sinless mother, inherited no tendencies to sin, and
for this reason did not sin, removes Him from the realm of a
fallen world, and from the very place where help is needed. On
His human side, Christ inherited just what every child of Adam
inherits, - a sinful nature. On the divine side, from His very
conception He was begotten and born of the Spirit. And all this
was done to place mankind on vantage-ground, and to demonstrate
that in the very same way every one who is born of
the Spirit may gain like victories over sin in his own
sinful flesh. (Bible Readings for the Home Circle,
p. 174, 1935 ed., also p. 115, 1915 ed. - emphasis in the
original)
This statement was altered by Prof. D. E.
Rebok when he was asked to revise the book in 1949 and today
reads:
Jesus Christ is both the Son of God and
the Son of man. As a member of the human family it behoved
him to be made like like unto his brethrenin
the likeness of sinful flesh. Just how far that
likeness goes is a mystery of the incarnation which
men have never been able to solve. The Bible clearly teaches that
Christ was tempted just as other men are temptedin
all points. . . like as we are. Such
temptation must necessarily include the possibility of sinning;
but Christ was without sin. There is no Bible support for the
teaching that the mother of Christ, by an immaculate conception,
was cut off from the sinful inheritance of the race, and
therefore her divine Son was incapable of sinning. (Bible
Readings for the Home, 1962 edition, p. 117)
This watered down statement takes no clear
position on the nature of Christ, neither pre-fall nor post-fall.
The Reformation Continues
The Reformation is not ended. Papal
teaching abounds not only within the confines of Catholicism, but
in much of Protestantism today. The Catholic dogma on the
incarnation is that Jesus is not really human at all, but of a
divine nature far separated from sinners. He is not in a place
where He can feel the needs of men. Such is not the true Christ,
but a false christ, a Tammuz we might weep for, yet receive no
help from. This is not the faith of Jesus.
Elder A. T. Jones of 1888 said it powerfully:
The faith of Jesus is that God sent
His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh.
The faith of Jesus is that in all
things it behooved Him to be made like unto His brethren.
The faith of Jesus is that He
Himself took our infirmities and was touched
with the feeling of our infirmities, being tempted in
all points like as we are. If He was not as we are,
He could not possibly be tempted like as we
are. But He was in all points tempted like as
we are. Therefore He was in all points
like as we are.
The faith of Rome as to the human nature
of Christ and Mary and of ourselves springs from that idea of the
natural mind that God is too pure and too holy to dwell with us
and in us in our sinful human nature; that sinful as we are, we
are too far off for Him in His purity and holiness to come to us
just as we are.
The true faiththe faith of
Jesusis that, far off from God as we are in our sinfulness,
in our human nature which He took, He has come to us just
where we are; that, infinitely pure and holy as He is, and
sinful, degraded, and lost as we are, He in Christ by His Holy
Spirit will willingly dwell with us and in us to save us, to
purify us, and to make us holy.
The faith of Rome is that we must be pure
and holy in order that God shall dwell with us at all.
The faith of Jesus is that God must dwell
with us and in us in order that we shall be holy or pure at
all. (The Consecrated Way to Christian Perfection, pp. 38,
39 - emphasis in original)
Why would all men not want such a Saviour?
Some read the implications very clearly. If Jesus overcame with
the same liabilities that we have, then it is possible for man in
fallen flesh to have total victory. If Jesus had come in some
other nature, then how could He expect from us that which He was
not able to do? The same victory that Jesus obtained in fallen,
sinful flesh, He desires to produce in our sinful flesh by His
indwelling presence! Jesus said, I can of Mine own self do
nothing. (John 5:30) The words that I speak unto you
I speak not of Myself: but the Father that dwelleth in Me, He
doeth the works. (John 14:10) We may overcome as Christ
overcame, totally depending upon divine help and guidance. Christ
has promised us: To him that overcometh will I grant to sit
with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down
with my Father in his throne. (Revelation 3:21)
|