Jesus Christ the Son of God

The last chapter began the study of the doctrine of God from the Scriptures. The following chapters will carry quotations from the pen of Sister White for the purpose of clarification and illustration. However, the doctrine will be based on the Bible and the Bible alone. This is in keeping with the following counsel.

But God will have a people upon the earth to maintain the Bible, and the Bible only, as the standard of all doctrines and the basis of all reforms. The opinions of learned men, the deductions of science, the creeds or decisions of ecclesiastical councils, as numerous and discordant as are the churches which they represent, the voice of the majority,— not one or all of these should be regarded as evidence for or against any point of religious faith. Before accepting any doctrine or precept, we should demand a plain “Thus saith the Lord” in its support.” (Spirit of Prophecy, vol. 4, p. 413)

When called to stand for our faith in courts of law and the synagogues (churches), we will not be able to say “Sister White says this,” or “Sister White says that.” Only a plain “thus saith the Lord” will provide the testimony necessary at that time.

Paul, writing to Timothy, states: “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” (2 Timothy 2:15) The fact that the word can be rightly divided tells us that it may also be wrongly divided. Jesus said in John 4:24: “God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.” We must worship according to truth, not the dictates of the councils. The first angel’s message of Revelation 14 calls us to worship the true God. To do this we must rightly divide the word of truth.

Zechariah, under inspiration, wrote: “the counsel of peace shall be between them both.” (Zechariah 6:13) The Hebrew word for “both” is Mybv - shenayim. It is the plural for two. God had an Associate that could enter into council with Him. This Being the Bible describes as His “only begotten Son.” A Father–Son relationship is simple enough for a child to understand, yet the Trinitarian does not accept the word of God for what it means. Instead, God’s Word must be given a deep spiritual meaning. Let us notice the plain testimony of the Scriptures.

Testimonies of Inspiration

Let us notice the Father’s testimony concerning Jesus Christ. At the baptism of Jesus, God spoke: “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” (Matthew 3:17) Here God calls Jesus His “beloved Son.” The exact same phrase is used in Matthew 17:5 where the Father acknowledges Jesus to be His Son at the Mount of Transfiguration.

Jesus, in talking to Nicodemus, stated: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.” (John 3:16-18) Here Jesus claims to be God’s Son and states that God indeed did have a Son to send. When standing before Caiaphas, Jesus acknowledged, under oath, that He was the Son of God.

And the high priest stood up in the midst, and asked Jesus, saying, Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee? But he held his peace, and answered nothing. Again the high priest asked him, and said unto him, Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed? (Mark 14:60-61)

Matthew includes Caiaphas’ words, “I adjure thee by the living God.” (Matthew 26:63) Until this point Christ had been silent, now He speaks and replies plainly, “I am.” (Mark 14:62) Ellen G. White adds this insightful comment:

To this appeal Christ could not remain silent. There was a time to be silent, and a time to speak. He had not spoken until directly questioned. He knew that to answer now would make His death certain. But the appeal was made by the highest acknowledged authority of the nation, and in the name of the Most High. Christ would not fail to show proper respect for the law. More than this, His own relation to the Father was called in question. He must plainly declare His character and mission. Jesus had said to His disciples, “Whosoever therefore shall confess Me before men, him will I confess also before My Father which is in heaven.” Matt. 10:32. Now by His own example He repeated the lesson. (Desire of Ages, pp. 706, 707)

The apostles declared Jesus to be the Son of God. “When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am? And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets. He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.” (Matthew 16:13-17) While Peter’s confession is known by many, it was actually Nathanael who first acknowledged Jesus as the Son of God. In John 1:49 we read: “Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel.”

The first truth that the apostle Paul preached after his conversion was that Jesus was the Son of God: “And when he had received meat, he was strengthened. Then was Saul certain days with the disciples which were at Damascus. And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God.” (Acts 9:19-20)

Not a “Spiritual Son”

God has declared Jesus to be His Son. Jesus, under oath, said that He was the Son of God. The apostles proclaimed Him to be the Son of God. If the plan of salvation is supposed to be simple enough for a young child to understand, can we honestly accept the testimony of God, Christ, and the apostles, or must we put some deep interpretation upon these words to make them mean something that they do not say? The doctrine of the Trinity teaches that Jesus is not really the Son of God, but rather He is a co-equal with God who plays the role of a son. God plays the role of a father, and the Holy Spirit plays the role of actualizer. According to the Trinitarian doctrine, when the Bible says that “God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son,” it really means that God shared His fellow or pal with man. According to this teaching, Jesus did not call God His Father because He was His Father, but rather “to bring us into a close and personal relationship with God.” (Seventh-day Adventists Believe..., p. 20) According to the doctrine of the Trinity, “The Father seems to act as source, the Son as mediator, and the Spirit as actualizer or applier.” (Ibid., p. 24) The false theory that the relationship of God and Christ is not literal but role-played is arrived at through the use of a spiritual application to the terms “Father” and “Son.”

LeRoy Froom, historian and apologist for the Adventist Church, wrote his book Movement of Destiny with the purpose, among others, of promoting the Trinitarian doctrine. Froom uses a spiritual interpretation to state that when the Bible says Jesus is the Son of God, that He is not really the Son of God. Note Froom’s reasoning:

The term “son” is widely used in both the Old and the New Testaments wholly apart from the idea of generation or priority. Thus Paul makes a typical reference to “sons of disobedience” (Eph. 2:2; 5:6, R.S.V.). In fact, the term “son” was one of the most common Biblical ways of identifying the characteristics of a personality.

In Biblical terminology son, or sons, was constantly used to indicate the distinguishing character—such as sons of Zion, sons of Belial, sons of God, sons of men, sons of light, sons of the prophets, sons of the stranger, sons of the alien, sons of thunder, sons of the covenant. Christ said to a certain perfidious group, “Ye are of your father the devil” (John 8:44). The term son was therefore used to denote the characteristic  trait, the distinctive attribute. It signified the predominant character or intrinsic nature of a person. (Movement of Destiny, p. 301 - emphasis in original)

Froom places a “spiritual” application on the term “son.” There are indeed symbols and figures used in the Bible. The seventh chapter of Daniel portrays four different beasts coming out of the sea. (Daniel 7:3) These beasts are noted to be symbolic of “kings” or “kingdoms.” (Daniel 7:17, 23) However, the Bible student must be careful not to put a spiritual meaning where it is not intended. For example, Jesus claimed to be the “light of the world.” (John 8:12) If we couple this with Genesis 1:3 where we read that on the first day God spoke and said, “Let there be light,” we might be led to believe, as the Jehovah’s Witnesses, that Christ was the first and highest of all created beings. This would be a very poor conclusion based on improper interpretation. The question now comes, Is there a safe rule of interpretation that may be used? The reformers and Advent pioneers used a very safe rule of interpretation. As Ellen White noted:

The language of the Bible should be explained according to its obvious meaning, unless a symbol or figure is employed. (Great Controversy, p. 599)

This rule does not deny the use of symbols, but it simply says that if the language is plain and simple, accept it for what it says. If there is reason to believe that the terms are symbolic, then, of course, the Bible will supply the key for that symbol such as it does with beasts and kingdoms in Daniel.

The Literal Son of God

Now we must ask ourselves, Is Christ the real Son of God, or is He only spoken of this way because of a spiritual relationship? The safe rule of Bible interpretation would tell us that if the vital points of salvation are simple enough for a child to understand, then Christ must be the literal Son of God. However, God does not leave us here on this important subject without further evidence. In Hebrews 1:4 we read that Jesus has “by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they [the angels].” He has His name by inheritance! He is the real Son of God! Paul continues by quoting the Septuagint version of Deuteronomy 32:43 applying the phrase, “let all the angels of God worship him” to Christ. Worship is a very serious matter. To worship a creature would be blasphemy. But Paul has noted at the very beginning of his epistle that God created the worlds through Christ. God appointed His Son to be the active agent in the creation process. As the true literal Son of the living God, Jesus rightly receives the name “God” because He is the same substance and matter as his Father. In fact, Paul calls Jesus the “express image of his person.” (Hebrews 1:3)

To further show the position of the Son of God, Paul quotes from Psalm 45:6, 7: “But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a scepter of righteousness is the scepter of thy kingdom. Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.” (Hebrews 1:8, 9) According to Paul, the Father is here speaking to His Son and He calls Jesus “God”! If the Father is pleased and content to call Jesus “God,” then should we consider His Son as anything less than divine? Even after the incarnation when Jesus had laid aside His immortality and other divine attributes, He is still the divine Son of God because of who He is, not what He is. Christ has always been the Son of God. I have a son; his name is Hans Stump. His being my son does not diminish him in any way. He is still a Stump even though he was begotten.

Not only does the Father call Jesus God, but He also goes on to refer to Himself as the God of Christ Jesus saying, “God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.” This harmonizes with the following Scriptures:

And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? (Matthew 27:46)

Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God. (John 20:17)

Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name. (Revelation 3:12)

That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him: (Ephesians 1:17)

While the Father is called the God of Jesus Christ, Jesus is never called the God of the Father! Even though God has elevated Christ to sit equal with Him on the throne of the universe, there is a willing subordination of the Son to the Father. Paul, writing to the church at Corinth, makes note of this subordination:

Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him. And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all. (1 Corinthians 15:24-28)

The Gospel from the “Council of Peace”

While “God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son,” it must be remembered that Jesus was willing to come and die as the sacrifice for the sins of the world. This was the greatest example of cooperation ever displayed, the blueprint being devised in the ages of eternity past. God, in His omniscience, knew before creation began that His highest created being would one day rebel against Him. God also knew that this rebel would lead many of his fellow angels in war against Him. Therefore, eons before men or angels existed, a plan was devised to bring harmony to the universe. This plan of God’s Son dying for the sins of men was laid before “the foundation of the world.” ( Revelation 13:8)

God had instructed Adam and Eve: “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof dying thou shalt die.” (Genesis 2:16, 17 margin.) Even though our first parents, at the time of their sin, experienced a spiritual fall and the physical life forces began to decay, they did not die in totality that very day. The reason that they did not die was that a plan had been put into action. Peter stated at Pentecost:

Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know: Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain: Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it. (Acts 2:22-24)

Acts 2:23 in the Amplified Bible states: “According to the definite and fixed purpose and settled plan and foreknowledge of God.” This is why Jesus is the “lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” Christ was “delivered by the determined counsel and foreknowledge of God.” The plan had already been worked out. When we read in John 3:16 that God gave His Son, the giving did not begin at Bethlehem. He made the decision before the crisis, before the opportunity for sin had even the chance to surface. This decision was agreed upon in “the counsel of peace” between God and Christ.

And speak unto him, saying, Thus speaketh the LORD of hosts, saying, Behold the man whose name is The BRANCH; and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the LORD: Even he shall build the temple of the LORD; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule upon his throne; and he shall be a priest upon his throne: and the counsel of peace shall be between them both. (Zechariah  6:12, 13)

Under inspiration, Zechariah mentions, “The LORD of hosts” - the Father; and “The BRANCH” - Christ. The Branch was to be both a ruler [lord] and priest [anointed one - Christ]. The high priest of Israel was referred to as the one that was “anointed.” (see Leviticus 4:3, 5, 16) This is the same Hebrew word found in Daniel 9:25 & 26 translated “Messiah.”  Peter further stated on the day of Pentecost that God had made  Jesus “both Lord and Christ.” The term “Christ” means Anointed One or Messiah. (See Acts 2:36)

God sent his Son on a mission to pay the greatest ransom ever. The Bible states that Christ “gave himself a ransom for all.” (1 Timothy 2:6) Galatians 1:4 says that Jesus “gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the will of God and our Father.” The wages of sin is death and only the death of the Son of God could buy back man from the death he had earned. This death of Christ was “according to the will of God and our Father.” Here we see God’s  great love for humanity. “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16)

The mission of Christ was to preach the gospel, set the sinner free from sin, heal the broken hearted, and pay the ransom for man’s sin.

And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for to read. And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Isaiah. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written, The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. (Luke 4:16-19)

The Jews had for centuries looked for the Anointed One or Messiah. As one reads the account of Andrew learning of Jesus, he can feel the excitement that must have been in the disciple’s heart. “One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother. He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messiah, which is, being interpreted, the Christ.” (John 1:40, 41) While Andrew and the other disciples began to realize who Jesus was, most of the Jews did not recognize Jesus as the Christ or Anointed One. They did not realize that He must first die for their sins before He could rule as king.

Just as soon as man had sinned the promise of a Redeemer was given. There would come from the seed of the woman One who would bruise the head of the serpent. “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” (Genesis 3:15) This promise was repeated to Abraham, “And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.” (Genesis 22:18) The promise was repeated to Isaac and Jacob. (See Genesis 26:4; 28:14.) The promise was next handed down to Judah: “The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.” (Genesis 49:10) The scepter did come to Judah in the person of King David who received the promise of a special son.

And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever. I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men: But my mercy shall not depart away from him, as I took it from Saul, whom I put away before thee. And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever. (2 Samuel 7:12-16)

While this was to apply to David’s son Solomon, Peter, at the day of Pentecost, applies part of this prophecy to Jesus Christ:

Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulcher is with us unto this day. Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne. (Acts 2:29, 30)

Under the figure of a Branch, Jeremiah prophesied of a King who would come after Solomon. “Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth. In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.” (Jeremiah 23:5, 6) The Branch, who was to to be a king, would rule with righteousness because He had received the Spirit of God. “ And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots: And the spirit of the LORD shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD.” (Isaiah 11:1, 2) The Redeemer to come was to be “the seed of the woman.” He was called “the Man whose name is the Branch.” He was to be called “the Son of the Highest,” (Luke 1:32) and “the Son of God.” (Luke 1:35)

The Bible teaches that the God who “cannot lie” told the truth when He said, “This is my beloved Son.” Christ, who had “no guile” in His mouth, told the truth when He claimed to be the Son of God. The “Scripture of truth” didn’t lie when it prophesied of the priest-king who was to be “the Son of the Highest.” To personally know Jesus Christ as the Son of God is a very serious matter.

And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. (John 17:3)

Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also. (1 John 2:22, 23)

He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son. And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life. These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God. (1 John 5:10-13)

The Scriptures teach that “the wages of sin is death.” (Romans 6:23) Salvation from sin and death come only through Jesus Christ the Son of God. “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12)

There is but one way of escape for the sinner. There is but one agency whereby he may be cleansed from sin. He must accept the propitiation that has been made by the Lamb of God, who taketh away the sins of the world. The shed blood of Christ cleanseth us from all sin. “For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.” “Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins.” A complete offering has been made; for “God so loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten Son,”— not a son by creation, as were the angels, nor a son by adoption, as is the forgiven sinner, but a Son begotten in the express image of the Father’s person, and in all the brightness of his majesty and glory, one equal with God in authority, dignity, and divine perfection. In him dwelt all the fullness of the Godhead bodily.  (The Signs of the Times, May 30, 1895)

A sign in the window of a locally owned pharmacy once read, “God Punishes, but Jesus Saves.” While all sincere Christians would appreciate the concern and effort the store owner made to witness, the sign sends a message that is at odds with the gospel. The sign presents God and Christ as working from two different positions with two different goals. God is portrayed as a judge who will punish, while Jesus is presented as a loving Saviour who will save the sinner from the judgment of the Father. This approach is used in Catholicism and many other false Christian systems of worship where the true Gospel is not understood. While there is a judgment, let us remember that both God and Christ are earnestly working to win man’s heart so that he can be in Their company forever. It was God who gave His only begotten Son, and Christ who willingly came to die for the sinner “according to the will of God.” (Galatians 1:4) The love that God and Christ share for humanity was expressed by Jesus as a love equal to that which the Father and Son share. Jesus said:

As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in my love. (John 15:9)

I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me. (John 17:23)

No wonder Jesus said, “I and my Father are one.” (John 10:30) They are working together with a singleness of purpose for the salvation of man.